Whistleblowing


Editors' Picks (4)
Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Punishment Regimes for Bribery This paper presents a behavioural experiment designed to test the decision-making process around bribery according to punishment strategies. This experiment was conducted in Bonn and Shanghai with 192 students. In the vein of behavioural economics, the authors designed a lab experiment to investigate the effect of punishment regimes on bribery behaviours. Observing that two types of legal frameworks coexist for penalizing bribery, the authors question their relative effectiveness in preventing corruption. Symmetric punishment regimes are legal frameworks that equally penalize bribers and recipients, whereas asymmetric regimes tend to punish the recipient more harshly. Read More...
Procurement Issues in Malaysia In the paper, "Procurement issues in Malaysia", which has recently been published in the International Journal of Public Sector Management, the authors offer new insight into stakeholder perceptions of the public procurement system of Malaysia. The study is based on 250 focus-group interviews with contractors and 18 semi-structured interviews with procurement officers. With interviews conducted over a nine-month period in 2007, research findings suggest cronyism and irregular procurement processes continue to pose a challenge for Malaysian industry. Read More...
Anticorruption Commissions: The “Hong Kong Model” Revisited Over the past 15 years the use of anticorruption commissions (ACCs) has diminished significantly. The reason is that both academics and leading donor organizations have discouraged their use for what appears to be unsubstantiated reasons. Conversely, this paper argues against contemporary thought and proclaims that ACCs should be established more frequently in order to reduce corruption. The author has practitioner experience as former Commissioner of the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in Hong Kong. The paper is essentially divided into three sections, 1) the reasons why ACCs have been discouraged; 2) a detailed description of the ICAC; and 3) a negation of the reasons used by many contemporary academics and donor organizations to discourage ACCs. Read More...
More >>
Courses (1)
Leading with Ethics and Compliance (UC Berkeley) This executive education course aimed at compliance professionals and executives takes an integrative approach to ethics and compliance programming. In an immersive, action-oriented curriculum, participants will work with a mix of UC Berkeley faculty and industry experts. Through case studies, classroom lecture, and group breakout sessions, faculty and industry experts will deliver strategic and tactical insights that can be applied immediately. Read More...
 
 
From the Marketplace