<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
         xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/corruption-datasets/RSS">
  <title>Browse Datasets</title>
  <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org</link>
  
  <description>
    
       
       
  </description>
  
  
  
            <syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
            <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
            <syn:updateBase>2009-10-30T05:08:36Z</syn:updateBase>
        
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/bg_head.jpg"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-humanitarian-response-index"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/global-right-to-information-rating"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/where-the-bribes-are-interactive-database"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-bribe-payers-index"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-aid-transparency-index"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-ibrahim-index-of-african-governance"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/east-africa-bribery-index-2011-1"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-financial-secrecy-index"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/the-european-social-survey-ess-round-5-2010"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/doing-business-2012"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/the-rule-of-law-index-2011"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/the-russia-longitudinal-monitoring-survey-higher-school-of-economics"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/world-development-indicators-2011"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/freedom-in-the-world-2011"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/corruption-in-afghanistan-bribery-as-reported-by-the-victims"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-humanitarian-response-index">        <title>2011 Humanitarian Response Index</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-humanitarian-response-index</link>        <description>Since 2007, DARA’s Humanitarian Response Index (HRI) has provided an independent assessment on how well donor governments apply the GHD Principles with the aim of improving the quality, effectiveness, transparency and accountability of governments’ aid. The HRI 2011 report indicates that government’s humanitarian aid budgets are not being maximised effectively to the detriment of vulnerable populations. The fact that most of the crises analysed were predictable reveals the international community’s inability to address chronic vulnerability by strengthening resilience and increasing capacity for prevention and preparedness, as demonstrated by the famine in the Horn of Africa. The HRI 2011 also found that gender remains more of a political commitment than a practical reality.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2012-03-13T15:02:39Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/global-right-to-information-rating">        <title>Global Right to Information Rating</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/global-right-to-information-rating</link>        <description>The Right to Information (RTI) rating, which covers 89 countries around the world, was developed by Access Info Europe and the Centre for Law and Democracy. The central idea behind the RTI Rating is to provide RTI advocates, reformers, legislators and others with a reliable tool for assessing the overall strength of the legal framework in their country for RTI. The Rating also indicates the strengths and weaknesses of the legal framework in seven different categories, namely: Right of Access, Scope, Requesting Procedures, Exceptions and Refusals, Appeals, Sanctions and Protections, and Promotional Measures. There are a total of 61 Indicators, each with a range of possible scores which in most cases is 0-2, for a possible total of 150 points. The Indicators are drawn from a wide range of international standards on the right to information, as well as comparative study of numerous right to information laws from around the world. A standardised scoring tool, based on the Indicators, was developed to ensure that the points under each Indicator were allocated consistently across different countries. The scoring tool was then applied to each of the 89 countries with right to information laws around the world by researchers at CLD and AIE. The analysis shows vast room for improvement: two thirds of countries (64%) scored in the middle range, between 60 and 100 points out of 150. Typical weaknesses were the limited scope, over-broad exceptions regimes, shortcomings in oversight and appeals mechanisms, and lack of legal requirements to promote awareness of the public's right of access to information. Please see link for more details. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2012-01-10T14:52:39Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/where-the-bribes-are-interactive-database">        <title>Where the Bribes Are Paid - Interactive Database</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/where-the-bribes-are-interactive-database</link>        <description>This interactive database compiles decades of data on violations and penalties under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.S.   flagship legislation that makes bribery of foreign officials a crime. Since its inception, prosecutors have penalized over 200 companies under the FCPA in about 80 countries, amassing about $4 billion in penalties. The database, called Where the Bribes are Paid , allows users to see how the total penalties amassed in each country break down by sector.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-11-28T13:18:38Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-bribe-payers-index">        <title>2011 Bribe Payers Index</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-bribe-payers-index</link>        <description>The Bribe Payers Index is a unique tool capturing the supply side of international bribery, specifically focussing on bribes paid by the private sector. The 2011 Bribe Payers Index is the fifth edition of the index, ranking 28 of the world’s largest economies according to the likelihood of firms from these countries to bribe when doing business abroad. It is based on the results of Transparency International’s 2011 Bribe Payers Survey. This asked 3,016 senior business executives in 30 countries around the world for their perceptions of the likelihood of companies, from countries they have business dealings with, to engage in bribery when doing business in the executive’s country. A sectoral ranking is also available which scores and ranks 19 sectors. The survey asked how often three different types of bribery were perceived to occur in each sector: firstly, bribery of low-ranking public officials; secondly, improper contributions to high-ranking politicians to achieve influence; and thirdly, bribery between private companies.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-11-24T11:41:30Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-aid-transparency-index">        <title>2011 Aid Transparency Index</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-aid-transparency-index</link>        <description>The 2011 pilot Aid Transparency Index collects for the first time primary data on aid transparency levels, with help from civil society organisations (CSOs) in 34 countries. The Index assesses the availability of specific information
items at organisational, country and activity level for 58
donor organisations, including bilateral and multilateral
donors, International Financial Institutions (IFIs) and private foundations. It then ranks these donors by assigning
scores for whether specific aid information was published
combined with an organisational level assessment of
whether the donor is participating in the International Aid Transparency Initiative and whether
they have a Freedom of Information law (or equivalent
disclosure policy).</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-12-19T12:46:52Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-ibrahim-index-of-african-governance">        <title>2011 Ibrahim Index of African Governance</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-ibrahim-index-of-african-governance</link>        <description>the Ibrahim Index is the most comprehensive collection of quantitative data that provides an annual assessment of governance performance in every African country. It compiles 86 indicators grouped into 14 sub-categories and four overarching categories to measure the effective delivery of public goods and services to African citizens. Topics covered by the index include: Rule of law, accountability, personal safety, participation, gender, human rights, public management, infrastructure, education and health. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-11-08T14:42:18Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/east-africa-bribery-index-2011-1">        <title>2011 East Africa Bribery Index</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/east-africa-bribery-index-2011-1</link>        <description>The index aims at measuring bribery levels in both the public and private sectors in the five countries in the region - Uganda, Kenya, Burundi, Rwanda and Tanzania. In the 2011 edition, a survey was conducted with almost 13,000 randomly selected respondents in all countries between February and May 2011. The results showed that Burundi continues to be the country with the highest level of bribery (37.9%) in the region, followed by Uganda (33%) and Tanzania (31.6%). Rwanda is the least bribery prone country, with a bribery prevalence of 5.1%. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-12-19T13:37:50Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-financial-secrecy-index">        <title>2011 Financial Secrecy Index</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/2011-financial-secrecy-index</link>        <description>The Financial Secrecy Index is a tool for understanding global financial secrecy, corruption and illicit financial flows. The FSI combines two measurements, one qualitative and one quantitative. The qualitative measure looks at a jurisdiction’s laws and regulations, international treaties, and so on, to assess how secretive it is.  The assessment is given in the form of a secrecy score: the higher the score, the more secretive the jurisdiction.  The second, quantitative, measurement attaches a weighting to take account of the jurisdiction’s size and overall importance to the global financial markets. The 2011 Financial Secrecy Index (FSI) focuses on 73 secrecy jurisdictions. These places set up laws and systems which provide legal and financial secrecy to others, elsewhere. The index reveals that the traditional stereotype of tax havens is misplaced. The FSI reveals without doubt that the world’s most important providers of financial secrecy are not small, palm-fringed islands as many suppose, but some of the world’s biggest and wealthiest countries.
</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-10-31T14:50:27Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/the-european-social-survey-ess-round-5-2010">        <title>The European Social Survey, ESS Round 5 - 2010</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/the-european-social-survey-ess-round-5-2010</link>        <description>The European Social Survey (ESS) is an academically-driven multi-country survey, which has been administered in over 30 countries to date. It has three aims - First, to monitor and interpret changing public attitudes and values within Europe and to investigate how they interact with Europe's changing institutions; Second, to advance and consolidate improved methods of cross-national survey measurement in Europe and beyond; and third, to develop a series of European social indicators, including attitudinal indicators. This fifth round of the survey covers 28 countries, which includes Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.The questionnaire includes two main sections, each consisting of approximately 120 items; a 'core' module which remains relatively constant from round to round, plus two or more 'rotating' modules, repeated at intervals. The core module aims to monitor change and continuity in a wide range of social variables, including media use; social and public trust; political interest and participation; socio-political orientations; governance and efficacy; moral; political and social values; social exclusion, national, ethnic and religious allegiances; well-being; health and security; human values; demographics and socio-economics.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>thomasroca</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-10-27T10:33:46Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/doing-business-2012">        <title>Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World </title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/doing-business-2012</link>        <description>This year's ranking and report assesses regulations affecting domestic firms in 183 economies and ranks the economies in 10 areas of business regulation, such as starting a business, resolving insolvency and trading across borders. The report rankings on ease of doing business have expanded to include indicators on getting electricity. In this year's rankings Singapore leads on the overall ease of doing business, followed by Hong Kong SAR, China; New Zealand; the United States; and Denmark. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-10-20T09:44:40Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/the-rule-of-law-index-2011">        <title>The Rule of Law Index, 2011</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/the-rule-of-law-index-2011</link>        <description>The Rule of Law Index is a  quantitative assessment tool designed to offer a comprehensive picture of the extent to which countries adhere to the rule of law. The Index presents a comprehensive set of indicators on the rule of law from the perspective of the ordinary person. It examines practical situations in which a rule of law deficit may affect the daily lives of ordinary people. For example, it evaluates whether citizens can access public services without the need to bribe a government officer. The Index provides new data on the following nine dimensions of the rule of law: limited government powers, absence of corruption, order and security, fundamental rights, open government, effective regulatory enforcement, access to civil justice, effective criminal justice, informal justice. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-09-23T11:04:20Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/the-russia-longitudinal-monitoring-survey-higher-school-of-economics">        <title>The Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey - Higher School of Economics</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/the-russia-longitudinal-monitoring-survey-higher-school-of-economics</link>        <description>'The Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS) is a series of nationally representative surveys designed to monitor the effects of Russian reforms on the health and economic welfare of households and individuals in the Russian Federation. These effects are measured by a variety of means: detailed monitoring of individuals' health status and dietary intake, precise measurement of household-level expenditures and service utilization, and collection of relevant community-level data, including region-specific prices and community infrastructure data. Data have been collected 18 times since 1992.'

This longitudinal survey could become a valuable source of information for researchers working on the problems of petty corruption in healthcare in Russia. The section 'Medical services' of the Adult Questionannaire in almost all the waves of the survey includes a big range of questions on informal payments for healthcare.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>dariaukhova</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-08-01T14:08:49Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/world-development-indicators-2011">        <title>World Development Indicators 2011</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/world-development-indicators-2011</link>        <description>The primary World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially-recognized international sources, the World Development Indicators (WDI) is the World Bank's flagship statistical publication and establishes the benchmark against which development progress is measured. This 15th edition of WDI in its current format, aims to provide relevant, high-quality, internationally comparable statistics about development and the quality of people’s lives around the globe. It focuses on the impact of the decision to make data freely available under an open license and with better online tools. The section introductions discuss key issues in measuring the economic and social phenomena described in the tables and charts and introduce new sources of data. It includes more than 900 indicators in more than 90 tables organized in 6 sections: World View, People, Environment, Economy, States and Markets, and Global Links. The data includes national, regional and global estimates.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-07-12T12:17:00Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/freedom-in-the-world-2011">        <title>Freedom in the World 2011</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/freedom-in-the-world-2011</link>        <description>Freedom in the World, Freedom House’s flagship publication, is a comparative assessment of global political rights and civil liberties. The Freedom in the World 2011 survey contains reports on 194 countries and 14 related and disputed territories. Each country report begins with a section containing the following information: population,capital, political rights (numerical rating), civil liberties (numerical rating), status (Free, Partly Free, or Not Free), and a 10-year ratings timeline. </description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-07-06T08:13:22Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/corruption-in-afghanistan-bribery-as-reported-by-the-victims">        <title>Corruption in Afghanistan: Bribery as reported by the victims</title>        <link>http://corruptionresearchnetwork.org/datasets/corruption-in-afghanistan-bribery-as-reported-by-the-victims</link>        <description>This report is based on results from a sample survey conducted in rural and urban areas of Afghanistan. The survey covered 12 provincial capitals and more than 1,600 villages across the country: overall more than 7,600 people were randomly selected and interviewed. The survey was conducted between August and October 2009 and it recorded the real experiences, as reported by respondents, in terms of bribes paid and contacts with public officials in the 12 months before the survey.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>fnawaz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2011-05-03T14:15:14Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>DataSet</dc:type>    </item>




</rdf:RDF>

